Our Philosophy about Philosophies and Whether our Philosophies are Really Philosophies at All
Our philosophy on the website is important to us even if it can’t really be called a philosophy at all. We’re actually not interested in a semantic argument on that issue (which we think would qualify as irony). We love it when people tell us their thinking behind what they’re doing. That’s the royal we, * you understand, not the all inclusive we that pertains to the entire human race. We’re not so naive to think that all humans love to hear what other people think. In fact, some humans positively hate to hear it as you can see by watching any news coverage of the 2016 election in the U.S.A. which has come to set the standard in why Churchill was right when he said that the best argument against democracy is some time with the average voter. * For the most part though humans appreciate honesty and that’s what we aim to provide. We believe it’s right and proper to state upfront what we’re about on this website. We’d like to build an audience of tolerant, thick-skinned, with a good sense of humour and a common interest in putting the world to rights. We want our readers to be people who enjoy film and TV as much as we do. We want to inform people who like to hear about new technology such as Elon Musks latest world-saving product or the next big thing in computing.
Our Review Philosophy
If you disagree with our reviews, that’s fine and to be expected. No reviewer or blogger will perfectly match your taste in technology, film and television, books, wallpaper, fly fishing techniques, humour or politics. We believe very strongly in free speech and our own right to say that we love something or felt it was awful. Equally, we believe you have the right to disagree with us. Our own preference is to look for reviewers that offer a fresh and informed perspective and if we need to make a really important decision, we look for multiple points of view.
Our Philosophy about Rants and Bad Language and Opinions
* It’s really just me at the moment (Jon). I live in hope of guest bloggers and using the word ‘we’ could reduce the need for future changes….
** Churchill did not favour an alternative to democracy in case you’ve never heard that. He was just funny as well.
*** Please note that not all facts presented in this piece may, in fact, be entirely true. Sometimes people say things that are deliberately untrue in order to be humorous.
Amazon Links
“Semantic Argument is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Programme, an affiliate advertising programme designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.co.uk.”
Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.
Thankyou for subscribing.